Showing posts with label painting light. Show all posts
Showing posts with label painting light. Show all posts

Friday, 8 June 2012

Richard Wilson - View of Syon House across the Thames

View of Syon House across the Thames near Kew Gardens (c. 1760) by Richard Wilson
Oil on canvas, 104 x 139 cm
Neue Pinakothek, Munich
Continuing the notion of a yellow sky and water (see View of the Thames by Childe Hassam), here's another view of the Thames - this time at Kew.

The painter of this scene is Richard Wilson - the man regarded as the father of British Landscape Painting and the finest painter Wales has ever produced.  He painted this scene shortly after his return from Italy where he developed his skills as a landscape painter.

The hazy warm yellow glow is very much redolent of the style of the artist who had profoundly influenced his landscape painting - Claude Lorrain.  It's almost as if the Roman campagna has arrived in southwest London!

That said the sun does set in the west behind Syon House and this indicates that this is an early evening painting in summer.

The important point about this painting is that has been painted the year after Kew Gardens became established as a botanical garden - in 1759.
In 1759, Princess Augusta and Lord Bute established the first botanic garden at Kew, employing William Aiton as the gardener. The Physic or Exotic Garden is the direct ancestor of today's establishment and this date is now accepted as the foundation of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Kew, History and Heritage - Kew's first botanic garden
The place

The scene is one of my own personal "places to paint" (or rather sketch - see The Thames at Kew - in March sunshine).

Wilson's perspective is from a mound - which nowadays has a very convenient seat - at the end of the walk known as Syon Vista and next to the path at the far end of Kew Gardens.  This gives an excellent view of the River Thames and Syon House.

The Artist

Richard Wilson RA was a pioneer of landscape painting in the UK.  Both Turner and Constable admired his paintings.

He was born on 1 August 1713 in Penegoes, Montgomeryshire in Wales.  He died on 11 May 1782 age 68 at Colomendy Hall, near Llanferres, Denbighshire and is buried in St Mary's Churchyard in Mold.  He never married.

His family was well connected and a relative sent him to London to train to become a painter and he initially trained as a portrait painter.  It appears he was successful gaining commissions and setting up his own studio.

He begins to demonstrate an interest in landscape painting from the mid 40s onwards.  However it's unclear why he subsequently became more interested in landscape painting. However it is known that he went to study in Italy between 1750 - visiting Venice first and then Rome - and there became very much influenced by the paintings of Claude Lorrain. 

Wilson is sometimes called 'The English Claude'.

His approach to landscape painting

While in Italy, he earned a living and had modest success by selling picturesque paintings of Italian scenes to English aristocrats who were doing the "Grand Tour".  He devoted himself to painting idealised landscapes in the manner of Claud Lorrain.  The main contrast being that Richard Wilson was typically painting a real scene rather than an idealised picture.

As a landscape painter, Wilson was obsessed with light and the quality of light reflected from the sky - and he loved a good sunset!  His tendency to bathe a scene in golden light was well known.

However Richard Wilson was also very sensitive to colour and demonstrated in his paintings his appreciation of the very many hues found in nature.  John Ruskin wrote that Wilson "paints in a manly way, and occasionally reaches exquisite tones of colour".

Kew Gardens: The Pagoda and Bridge (1762) by Richard Wilson (1713-1782)
Oil on canvas,
Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection
When painting figures in a landscape, they play a minor role and do not intrude upon the overall impact of the landscape.

The website of records the following as being the way he approached the painting of landscapes
His landscape paintings were produced by first applying an underdrawing of brown paint, followed by ‘dead-colouring', a task which was given to the studio apprentices. Thin washes of colour were applied at this stage; Prussian blue and grey-brown for the sky, and a mixture of red and blue pigments for the landscape. The colour was applied to a thickness depending on the depth of tone required, allowing the light tone of the ground to show through more towards the horizon. Once the dead-colouring was dry it was oiled out before the second painting.

For the foreground Joseph Farington records that Wilson 'went over it a second time, heightening every part with colour and deepening the shadows, but still, brown, loose and flat, and left in a state for finishing: the half-tints laid in, without highlights.' In the third and final painting of the foreground Wilson altered the tints, adding the necessary sharpness to the different objects, before glazing them with rich warm tints, and finally adding further solid tints over this.

The sky and distant landscape, on the other hand, were worked wet-in wet after the initial dead-colouring, rather than in two separate stages. This allowed Wilson to achieve easier blending of the clouds with the blue of the sky, apparently using ultramarine rather than Prussian blue for this stage of painting. Last of all the horizon was adjusted and the distance softened with grey-brown again as necessary.
This is a complete catalogue of Richard Wilson's paintings - which has obviously been a labour of love for its creator.

The Yale Centre of British Art in America has an excellent collection of paintings by Richard Wilson.

Richard Wilson - art communities and art societies

On his return to England, Wilson took on a grand studio and was initially successful and held many exhibitions, gained a reputation and sold his landscapes to a number of different clients.

He was active in founding first the Society of Artists and then in 1768, age 55, he became a founder member of the Royal Academy of Art.  He became the Director of what became ‎(in 1765)‎ the Royal Society of Artists of Great Britain.

The prices for his paintings went up and up - along with Wilson's arrogance - until on one famous occasion he offered to let the King have a painting on an instalment plan!  After that the commissions began to dry up and at the end of his life he lived in poverty and had to rely on his family.

Wilson subsequently became an alcoholic and stared the slide into poverty and ill-health. At the end he was taken back to the family home in Wales. He died there on 11 May 1782.

Links:


Tuesday, 27 July 2010

David Curtis - Light Effects in Watercolour



Light Effects in Watercolour is the third YouTube video this week by landscape artist David Curtis.  Every time I watch him work in watercolour I see things he does that I do when I sketch - which makes me feel very comfortable watching his style of painting.  Which means that his way of making marks on paper in watercolour makes me think I should give watercolour another chance

I'm also finding it very illuminating to see just how watery his palette is and how big his brushes are!

This short video (2.43 minutes) comments on the treatment of light effects in watercolour - the importance of developing lost and found edges and the use of masking fluid.  The boldness of the way he floods the paper while reserving lights will be energising to more people than just me!

Friday, 25 June 2010

40 Antibes landscapes in 4 months by Claude Monet

Of the places people like to paint, the south of France has been a favourite with many artists because of the quality of the light.  It's interesting therefore to look at the different ways in which different artists treated it.


Antibes 1888 by Monet, Claude  
Oil on canvas; 
height: 65.5 cm (canvas); width: 92.4 cm (canvas); 
height: 85 cm (frame) ; width: 112 cm (frame); depth: 11 cm (frame)

One of my favourite paintings is a painting of a tree, called Antibes, painted by Claude Monet.  Its home is the Courtauld gallery and I sketched it recently (see Sketching Antibes in the Courtauld) - and I then decided that I wanted to find out a bit more about it.

Sketch of "Antibes" 
by Claude Monet at the Courtauld Galley
11.5" x 8" in Large Moleskine Sketchbook, pencil and coloured pencils
copyright Katherine Tyrrell

Monet painted gardens and the coastline in the south of France in the late nineteenth century.  What I'd never realised before is that Monet produced a large number of paintings of Antibes, all painted in fourmonths between January and May of 1888.  They're not really a series but I think I'd argue that they're very much a stepping stone towards his series paintings of the 1890s.
"I'm painting the town of Antibes, a small fortified town turned gold by the sun, standing out against beautiful blue and pink mountains and the everlastingly snow covered Alps."
Claude Monet
By the late 1880s Monet was definitely beginning to become interested in developing his series paintings.  Maybe because he was getting older and more settled at Giverny?  Maybe because his reputation now meant that he could take more time over his painting projects and become more involved with his interest in painting light? 

He certainly stopped painting people and started painting single motifs seen again and again in different light, different weather and in different seasons.  He was also trying to widen his audience beyond those who were familiar with his Normandy roots and the associated landscapes.  He was also trying to decentralise Impressionism - to take it to places beyond Paris.

Antibes was suggested by his dealer as being the antithesis of the Belle Isle.  It also enabled Monet to say that he painted both the south as well as the north of France.

Having now viewed these paintings (links below) I think the Antibes series is the beginning of Monet experimenting with repeated paintings of the same motif.

However research shows that starting to paint in a new area or a new motif was not without its trials and tribulations.  Having reviewed by books about Monet (some of which are listed below) it's become apparent that Monet was setting himself challenges.  He wanted new sites but wasn't averse to moaning about the difficulties he had in getting his paintings to work when he found one.  He wrote to Berthe Morisot while in Antibes as follows
It is so difficult, so delicate, so tender particularly for me who is inclined towards tougher subjects
To Geffroy he said
I am very worried about what I am doing.  It is so beautifiul here, so clear and luminous!  You are bathed in blue air, it's frightening!
While in Antibes he produced around 40 paintings of a limited range of motifs.  He initially had concerns about repeating himself and looked for more motifs.

On his return he created an exhibition Ten Marines from Antibes from 10 of the paintings at Boussod and Valadon in June 1888, which was about a month after he left the south of France. This was his second show of closely related works and it generated comment in the press.  All the works exhibited were purchased for 11,900Fr by Theo van Gogh (the art dealer brother of Vincent).  The remaining works were purchased by Durand Ruel and others which were mainly resold quickly to dealers in the USA.

The paintings are now dispersed and so far as I am aware nobody has tried to pull them together as a collection since they were painted.  Some are in private collections, some are in major art museums and some seem to have disappeared.  What follows are links to the ones I could find - listed by the location of their current owners.

Cleveland Museum of Art
Columbus Museum of Art
Courtauld Gallery, London
  • Antibes 1888 (aka The Esteral Mountains)
Kunstmuseum Basel
Museum of Fine Art Boston
As Monet grew older, his paintings became simpler. He began to focus on a single, isolated motif, the better to record the changes in color and light wrought on it by different times of day and fluctuations in weather. "Cap d'Antibes, Mistral" is one of three paintings of these very same trees that Monet made during his four-month sojourn in Antibes, from January through May 1888.
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
Philadelphia Museum of Art
The ancient walled city of Antibes is a hazy, ethereal presence across the sea in this painting of the Mediterranean coast, in which Monet's smooth brushwork evokes the heat of the morning and the languid stillness of the landscape. At the suggestion of the art dealer Paul Durand-Ruel, the artist visited Antibes on the Mediterranean Sea from January to April 1888. During the 1880s Monet increasingly explored areas beyond Paris and Normandy in search of fresh, appealing motifs. Sometimes these ventures into new territory were accompanied by doubts and challenges, as in the south, where the brilliant sun troubled Monet. He wrote to his companion and future wife, Alice Hoschedé, from Antibes: "How beautiful it is here, to be sure, but how difficult to paint! I can see what I want to do quite clearly but I'm not there yet. It's so clear and pure in its pinks and blues that the slightest misjudged stroke looks like a smear of dirt." Despite Monet's misgivings about his ability to evoke Mediterranean light, in June 1888 the dealer Theo van Gogh, Vincent's brother, bought and exhibited ten paintings that Monet made at Antibes, this work among them.
Jennifer A. Thompson, from Masterpieces from the Philadelphia Museum of Art: Impressionism and Modern Art (2007), p. 72.
Toledo Museum of Art, Ohio
Private Collections
Unknown locations
The main difference between the Antibes series and Monet's other series paintings is that the Antibe series featured a small number of different motifs.  He painted the same view of some of them (eg Antibes seen from the Salis Garden) at different times of day thus creating the pattern which was to become much expanded in later series.  The compositions for the most part are very simple and feature pine trees at the shoreline, or a view of the bay and distant town of Antibes.  In the background of most of them are the Maritime Alps. 

What's very clear from viewing them altogether as a group is that Monet had to change his palette to capture the colours of the south of France. His technique for making marks also ensured that he mad small touches of pure colour juxtaposed to create a vibrant shimmering colour as seen through the haze of the heat.

It's highly likely that many were bought as souvenirs of visits to the area.
    My reference sources for this post included:   
    Links:

    Thursday, 27 May 2010

    Two landscape exhibitions in London and Christen Købke

    Frederiksborg Slot ved Aftenbelysning
    ("Frederiksborg Palace in the Evening Light") 1835 by Christen Købke

    Two exhibitions of paintings by renowned landscape painters are coming to an end of their run in London - and both exhibitions finish on the 13th June 2010. These are:

    The latter moves next to the National Galleries of Scotland where it will be on display from 4 July - 3 October 2010.

    I've not written about Købke (1810–1848) before but have been to see the exhibition

    Købke is a painter of realism - adjusted to suit closely associated with what's called the Golden Age of Danish Painting. He's not well known and this is the first exhibition wholly devoted to his work outside Denmark.
    Emphasising his exquisite originality and experimental outlook, the exhibition focuses on the most innovative  aspects of his work – including outdoor sketching, his fascination with painterly immediacy, and treatment of light and atmosphere.
    This is a guide to the pictorial art associated with the Golden Age - which is worthy of a post in its own right at some point.< I'm going to limit comments here to the exhibition, because his work probably deserves more attention but within the context of the development of landscape painting in Denmark by artists influenced by C.W. Eckersberg. While Købke is obviously a very talented painter (particularly in relation to portraits and figures which demonstrated his very fine skills as a draughtsman) I found a number of the landscapes on the wall to be disappointing in terms of the billing given to him by the National Gallery. The theme of the exhibition is about him being a Master of Light. However a number of the paintings, when viewed in the exhibition, appeared to me to be rather less impressive than those seen in the video film which accompanies the exhibition.

    The latter gives a very good impression of the paintings as they must have been when first painted but that's partly due to the backlighting which enhances the sense of light. In reality, to me, a number of the paintings were considerably more subdued when viewed with some being really rather dull - in a literal sense. There was no question in my mind that this was probably because of their age, because virtually all are on loan from other collections and because some probably haven't been properly cleaned of late.

    It's difficult when somebody paints in the muted tones necessary to produce an effective sense of light. The lights in a painting then need to be kept clean and unsullied by time or the effect and impact can be much reduced. These are incredibly subtle paintings but for me some of that subtlety had been lost - and this was apparent when one saw some of the paintings in the exhibition where the overall effect appeared to be much closer to what the painter had intended.

    As a result I suspect that these might be paintings which may well look rather better in a book or film than they do when hanging on a wall.

    The painting which persuaded me that he was actually a fantastic painter of light was oddly enough his Portrait of the Landscape Painter Frederik Sødring (1832) from the Hirschsprung Collection where the luminous freshness of its colour scheme came across much more effectively. It's also a story of the influences on landscape painting in Denmark at the time - and serves to remind us how young Købke was when he painted most of his paintings (he died age 38). 

    Another influential painting was his rather romantic painting of Frederiksborg Palace in the Evening Light (see top).  This is in good condition and is very impressive in terms of the portrayal of that very curious light one gets just before the sun sets. 

    A third was the painting of boys on a bridge - an extract from which has been chosen for the catalogue of the exhibition - Christen Kobke: Danish Master of Light (see image on right).  This painting, again in good condition, is a fascinating depiction of the colour of warm stone - as well as a great composition and figurative painting.

    Where the paintings are in good condition - and it's certainly the case that some are - it was very interesting to see and study
    • how very little white/light paint needs to be applied to get a highlight effect if the rest of the painting is using suitably muted (clean) colours
    • how extreme subtleties are possible in the colour of warm stone, evening shadows and reflected light
    His landscape paintings are usually based on plein air studies.  He often drew and painted subjects close to the different places he lived in Copenhagen.  What I found fascinating was his impeccable portrayal of figures in a landscape - one of the best artists I've ever seen in this respect and some truly innovative and radical compositions for the age.

    James Gurney did a post about him recently - see Christen Købke

    In conclusion, I like the artist, I really appreciate his draughtsmanship and talent and I wish that those who looked after paintings would have some regard for how dirty and dull they can get over time.  



    Here are some other reviews of the exhibition
    Interestingly this last review uses the same image - "Frederiksborg Palace in the Evening Light" - which looks nothing like it does in the article in reality!

    Links: